The Importance of Samples and Populations
The final warning we wish to provide [in Chapter 5]
is really a repetition of a major concern expressed earlier in this chapter.
Simply stated, an empirical investigation that incorporates inferential
statistics is worthless unless there is a detailed description of the
population or the sample. No matter how carefully the researcher describes
the measuring instruments and procedures of the study, and regardless
of the levels of appropriateness and sophistication of the statistical
techniques used to analyze the data, the results will be meaningless unless
we are given a clear indication of the population from which the sample
was drawn (in the case of probability samples) or the sample itself (in
the case of nonprobability samples). Unfortunately, too many researchers
get carried away with their ability to use complex inferential techniques
when analyzing their data. We can almost guarantee that you will encounter
technical write-ups in which the researchers emphasize their analytical
skills to the near exclusion of a clear explanation of where their data
came from or to whom the results apply. When you come across such studies,
give the authors high marks for being able to flex their
"data analysis muscles"--but low marks for neglecting the basic
inferential nature of their investigations.
(From Chapter 5, p. 135)
|