Assessing Reliability and Validity
The second of our three final comments [in Chapter 4]
concerns the possible use of multiple methods to assess instrument quality.
Since there is no rule or law that prohibits researchers from using two
or more approaches when estimating reliability or validity, it is surprising
that so many research reports contain discussions of only one kind of
reliability and (if validity is discussed at all) only one kind of validity.
That kind of research reports is common because researchers typically
overlook the critical importance of having good data to work with . .
. and instead seem intent on quickly analyzing whatever data have been
collected. Give credit to those few researchers who present multiple kinds
of evidence when discussing reliability and validity. To see an example
of this good other look at the first excerpt included in this chapter.
(From Chapter 4, p. 109)
|