OUTLINE FOR CHAPTER
12
Post Hoc and Planned Comparisons
- Introduction
- The ambiguity of a significant F and the purpose of
post hoc comparisons
- Two features of planned comparisons
- The relative popularity of planned and post hoc comparisons
- Post Hoc Comparisons
- Definition and purpose
- Terminology
- Synonyms for "post hoc"
- "Contrast" and "comparison"
- The "omnibus" F-test
- "Pairwise" and "nonpairwise" comparisons
- Test procedures frequently used in post hoc analyses
- The 6 tests used most often by applied researchers
- Fisher's LSD
- Duncan's multiple range test
- Newman-Keuls test
- Bonferroni
- Tukey's test
- Scheffe's test
- "Liberal" vs. "conservative" procedures
- Comparing other groups vs. a control condition
- Dunnett's test
- Tamhane's test
- The null hypotheses of a post hoc investigation
- Presentation of results
- Summarize results in a passage of text
- Three different ways to summarize results in a table or
figure
- Attaching letters to means
- Notes using "<" and ">" symbols (and
maybe commas as well)
- Attaching letters to bars in a bargraph
- The Bonferroni
procedure as a post hoc technique
- Planned Comparisons
- How these comparisons can be examined directly without reference
to the omnibus F
- Test procedures used to make planned comparisons
- Pairwise and nonpairwise planned comparisons
- Comments
- Terminology
- A priori
- One degree-of-freedom F-test
- Orthogonal
- Assumptions
- The researcher's choice of test procedure
- Statistical significance vs. practical significance
- Other test procedures
|